The patterns repeat. A small engineering team. A board pushing for SOC 2 or HIPAA before the next raise. An incumbent vendor quote with three commas in it. We've solved this shape of problem with design partners across four verticals — pick the one closest to yours.
Voice, agent, and model-serving platforms where every service is itself autonomous. Defending agents with agents.
Read the playbook→02SOC 2, PCI-relevant, MAS-regulated. Continuous offensive validation with audit evidence collected automatically.
Read the playbook→03HIPAA BAA, PHI in scope. Logs never leave the cloud where PHI sits. Re-test fixes within the day.
Read the playbook→04Consolidating Splunk + Pentera + Tines + the analyst rota into one line item — usually inside a 12-month plan.
Read the playbook→You're shipping a product where every service is autonomous — agents calling APIs, agents writing code, agents holding tokens. The traditional SOC was built for a world where the threats were humans. Vulneron is built for the one where they're not.
You're selling to enterprise inside a regulatory frame: SOC 2, ISO 27001, MAS TRM, PCI-relevant. The questionnaire is the gate. The pentest line item is mandatory but useless ten days after it ships. Vulneron makes the questionnaire automatic and the pentest continuous.
You can't pipe PHI to a vendor data lake. You also can't hire a SOC. Vulneron's agents read logs in the same cloud account PHI lives in — and never pull bulk data across the boundary. BAA is signed on day one.
You bought the stack five years ago. Splunk renewals are non-negotiable. Pentera misses anything novel. Tines runbooks have rotted. Three analysts left in the last six months. We've run this consolidation with design partners — it's a 12-month plan, and the first contract pays for itself before the renewal.
Some teams aren't ready. We'll tell you that too. The worst outcome is a customer who hates their security tooling.